Tuesday, June 15, 2021

August 3, 2021 Special Election


Surprise folks, we've got another election happening in 2021. The Community College District of St. Louis, (and St. Louis County Missouri) Special Election has been scheduled for August 3, 2021. 

The only issue on your STL City August 3, 2021 ballot will be Prop R - an increase in the operating tax levy by $0.08 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation. The STLCC website estimates this investment to be approximately a $1.90/mo increase for a homeowner with a $150,000 home. This is the first request in nearly 40 years for a tax increase - the last time was 1984.

You can read the full press release by STLCC here about how they plan to use the additional operating budget, should it be approved by voters on August 3. 


Here are some highlights:
• Provide real-world learning environments where the technology in the classroom matches the tools students need in the workplace.

• Focus on providing educational programs and services to the underserved and minority communities of the St. Louis region.

• Repurpose underutilized space to meet the needs of today’s students (many of the College’s facilities were built more than 50 years ago) and create new and functional spaces.

• Keep tuition low and affordable for students, as well as minimize student debt. At $116.50 per credit hour, the College strives to keep education affordable for unemployed or underemployed workers needing training and retraining for the high-wage careers of today.


According to their website, STLCC has this to say about their Economic Impact in the STL region: 


Want to hear more? We're working on setting up a voter information night with speakers from Invest in St. Louis Community College – stay tuned for details.


The Saint Louis Community College is the largest higher educational institution in the region, STLCC has served more than 1.2 million students. Over 50% of households in the St. Louis area are represented in our former and current student body.

Polls will be open 6am - 7pm on Tuesday, August 3, 2021. Need to know about finding your polling location or have questions about absentee voting? Check out details on the St. Louis City Board of Election website here. Remember to get out and VOTE!

Friday, March 5, 2021

April 2021 Muni General Ballot



Finish the Job!
With the new Approval Voting system in STL City, we now have a run-off between two Mayoral Candidates set for April 6th. That might be the top of the ticket, but that's not all we'll be voting on.
• Mayoral Run-off
• Comptroller 
• 3 At Large SLPS School Board seats
• Prop E (City Earnings Tax)
• Prop Y (MSD Rate Commission) 
• Prop 1 -5 (Amendments to the Plan [Charter] of MSD)


Scroll down to learn more about these candidates/issues you'll see on your Tuesday, April 6th ballot.
(click on image to enlarge)







You can also view the full ballot for your address at VOTE411.org brought to you by the League of Women Voters Education Fund.


Mayor Run-off Election

Ward 24 March Primary Results

STL Citywide March Primary Results



You can read more about the candidates on their websites, but no matter who wins this runoff election, it's clear that the voters of St. Louis have made it clear that they want new leadership. 




"Spencer and Jones, together, knocked off the city’s old guard, which was lining up behind Lewis Reed, president of the Board of Aldermen, who has now lost three races for mayor. Reed has reached his political ceiling, while Jones and Spencer are breaking through one of their own." - Tony Messenger

Cara Spencer website

Curious about how the maps looked for the Primary vote?
Here is a visualzation by Andrew Arkills - citywide shades reveal vote breakdown
Visualization by Walter Jenkins - citywide dot visualization of candidate support

Mayoral Events/Surveys:

Watch video from Mayoral Forum Hosted by Missouri Growth Association, St. Louis Realtors and ULI St. Louis or View live-tweet of ULI St. Louis Forum from 3/9/21 here


Landmarks Association of St. Louis Candidate Surveys from  Cara Spencer and Tishaura Jones


Watch the Mayoral Debate on Fox2 and KPLR11 (3-23-21)


The Community Justice Coalition virtual candidates' forum (3/27/21) [video to come]

Watch the SLACO Youth-Centric Debate (3-29-21)


Wednesday, March 31 at 6:30pm Virtual Mayoral Forum Hosted by Omicron Eta Omega Chapter of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Incorporated  

You can find many video links from Primary season Mayoral Forums/Debates on my previous Blog "Our Next STL City Mayor"

Comptroller 

Darlene Green (unopposed) - Give her a vote, Ms. Green does a fantastic job for the City of STL.




SLPS School Board

SLPS Foundation and the American Federation of Teachers St. Louis, Local 420, AFLCIO candidate forum (3/11/21) watch recorded forum here or You can read the live-tweet of the forum here

STL Young Dems host SLPS Candidate Endorsement Forum (3/16/21) watch video here or you can
Read STL Young Dems candidate surveys hereThrough a vote of the membership, the STL Young Dems have endorsed: Sonnier, Davis, Vowell

Coalition of Black Trade Unionists - CBTU Saint Louis Chapter has endorsed: Davis, Merideth, Vowell
Ecumenical Council has endorsed: Davis, Merideth, Vowell




AFT St. Louis Committee on Political Education have endorsed the following candidates for St. Louis Public Schools Board of Education: Natalie V Vowell, Matt Davis, and David Meredith


 
Solidarity With SLPS has provided both the candidate survey responses and the grading rubric here

Their stated mission is "We are a group of St. Louis City residents working to support, defend, and help improve our Saint Louis Public Schools. We fight against privatization efforts of our children's education, including the proliferation of charter schools & defunding SLPS"

"Points were docked for failures to commit on questions 1-7 and answers that repeated privateer talking points around the union, school closures, or in-person learning. The scorecard does not represent formal endorsements in the Saint Louis Public Schools Board of Education race."


Solidarity with SLPS Candidate Survey Report Card 







Read about candidates supported by our 24th Ward Committeeman, Matthew Sisul: Daffney Moore and Toni Cousins. You can also watch their interview on Morning Blend Saint Louis. 

Here are the candidates in ballot order,
click on a candidate name for a link to candidate websites:

[10 candidates, vote for up to 3]


(WILLIAM (BILL) HAAS - will appear on the ballot, but Mr. Haas passed away on 3-31-21)

DAVID L. JACKSON, JR. - former School Board Member, Board President and VP (2007-15)

NATALIE VOWELL - current School Board Member and Board Secretary, Elected in 2017

J. L. MENDOZA QUINONES - (no website found)

DAFFNEY MOORE 
- running in partnership with Toni Cousins

ANTOINETTE (TONI) COUSINS - running in partnership with Daffney Moore (email: antioncousins@gmail.com)

EMILY HUBBARD - Lots of great info on her website, FB, Twitter and Instagram campaign accounts

DAVID MERIDETH - Yes, that same Merideth family, in 2019 was just short of getting that 3rd open seat

ALISHA SONNIER - "Student Advocate. Student Activist."

MATT DAVIS - "I believe it’s essential that parents have a voice in running the school district"


(Check back as I'll be adding more info/links for candidates as I can find them)


Prop E (Earnings Tax) 

We need a 60% majority vote to keep the Earnings Tax (because a billionaire asked the whole state to make us keep reauthorizing it to try and eliminate it because it takes an equal 1% from rich people, too and he doesn't like that) VOTE YES ON PROP E!

Both the Committeeman and I have endorsed YES on Prop E.

Listen to Collector of Revenue, Gregory FX Daly on St. Louis Public Radio make the case to keep the Earnings Tax


Watch STL TV interview with Gregory FX Daly on Yes on E

Watch STL TV Prop E information Video



Graphic: Action STL Power Project
Graphic: Action STL Power Project
Graphic: Action STL Power Project



For clarity, each of these MSD Propositions stands alone. Each may pass/fail not affecting the others.
For example Prop Y passes and Props 1-5 fail  = Prop Y still passes. 

Prop Y (MSD Rate Commission)

Wastewater work is happening no matter what, the question in Prop Y is how we pay for it.

A YES Vote on Y will allow MSD to use Bond Financing to pay for this work, your bill will increase at a gradual rate over time.  A NO Vote will mean that your MSD bill will increase at a more rapid rate, but overall the project will cost less. 



Provided by MSD Project Clear



This short video gives a great explanation: Watch 2:00 Video "Understanding Proposition Y" Here


Fact Sheet provided by MSD


Propositions 1-5

All 5 of these Propositions refer to amendments to the Plan (Charter) of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. This will be voted on by both STL City Voters AND St. Louis County voters on April 6. You will vote YES if you agree to the change stated in the Proposition, NO if you do not want the amendment.

Read Tom Sullivan's Editorial in the Post-Dispatch on MSD Ballot Issues

St. Louis Public Radio "St. Louis Region’s Sewer Utility Looks To Sell Bonds For Service Improvements" Ballot issue overview


Plan Amendment Summaries provided by Plan Amendment Commission website

PROPOSITION 1  (Ballot Language)

Shall the Plan (Charter) of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District be amended to remove obsolete provisions, modernize certain provisions, references and language and change certain provisions to align with current practices of the District, including but not limited to (a) removing obsolete positions and titles, (b) replacing “city workhouse” with “jail or detention facility”, (c) requiring that the District present annually to the City and County only upon request, (d) adding gender, sexual orientation, familial status, ancestry or national origin and disability to the list of protected classes, (e) providing that notice of proposed rate changes can be given by posting on the District’s website and other digital media, (f) replacing “affiliated with” with “a member of’ with respect to the current requirement that no two Trustees appointed from the City or County be “affiliated with” the same political party, (g) clarifying that documents submitted to the Board of Trustees in connection with an annexation also be made available to the public (h) and recognizing, in accordance with Missouri’s Sunshine Law, that hearings before the Civil Service Commission are not public hearings.

Proposition 1 Summary
⦁ Removes obsolete provisions, modernizes certain provisions, references and languages.

PROPOSITION 2 (Ballot Language)

Shall Article 5 of the Plan ( Charter) of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District relating to the passage of ordinances be amended to provide that ( a) an affirmative vote by two members of the Board of Trustees appointed from the City of St. Louis and two members appointed from St. Louis County shall be necessary to pass any ordinance, resolution, regulation, rule or order, except that with at least five Board members present and unanimous consent of all Board members present, an affirmative vote of any four Board members shall be sufficient for passage. and ( b) ordinances shall take effect immediately upon enactment unless a later date is specified therein?

Proposition 2 Summary
⦁ Current Charter requires yes votes from a minimum of 2 Board Members from each appointing authority, the City and County, to pass any ordinance, rule, etc.
a. New rule: If 5 present and with unanimous consent, any 4 yes votes will suffice for passage
⦁ Ordinances shall take effect immediately

 
Screencap from MSD Charter 6/5/12

PROPOSITION 3 (Ballot Language)

Shall Article 7 of the Plan ( Charter) of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District relating to the Rate Commission be amended to provide that ( a) a Rate Commission Representative Organization shall only have one voting Delegate, ( b) the Rate Commission Report shall be issued to the Board of Trustees no later than 165 days after receipt of a Rate Change Notice, ( c) the Board of Trustees is deemed to have accepted a Rate Commission Report if not rejected by resolution of the Board of Trustees within 100 days from the date the Rate Commission Report is issued, and ( d) a clarification be made to the criteria governing rates so that the financial impact on all classes of ratepayers is considered in determining a fair and reasonable burden?

Proposition 3 Summary
⦁ Clarifies Rate Commission voting delegates and timeline.
⦁ Requires consideration of financial impact on all classes of ratepayers to determine a fair and reasonable burden.


Screencap from MSD Charter 6/5/12


Screencap from MSD Charter 6/5/12


PROPOSITION 4 (Ballot Language)

Shall Articles 5 and 8 of the Plan ( Charter) of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District be amended to provide that ( a) compensation of a Trustee shall be $ 25 for each day of attendance at a public meeting of the Board and ( b) compensation of a member of the Civil Service Commission shall be $ 25 for each day of attendance at a meeting of the Commission, not exceeding $ 625 in any one fiscal year?

Proposition 4 Summary
⦁ Changes compensation for Trustees and members of Civil Service Commission to $25 for all public meetings.
⦁ Average annual Board compensation changes from $300/year to $600/year

Screencap from MSD Charter 6/5/12

Screencap from MSD Charter 6/5/12



PROPOSITION 5 (Ballot Language)

Shall Article 7 of the Plan ( Charter) of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District be amended to permit the District to engage the same independent auditing firm for a period in excess of five consecutive years if the District lets a competitive bid for auditing services and the lead audit partner or concurring partner does not perform auditing services for the District in excess of 5 consecutive years?

Proposition 5 Summary
⦁ Permits the District to engage the same independent auditing firm in excess of five consecutive years.
⦁ Only if District holds competitive bid for auditing services and the lead audit partner/concurring partner is changed.

Screencap from MSD Charter 6/5/12


Wednesday, January 6, 2021

Our Next STL City Mayor



The field is set, we have four candidates for Saint Louis Mayor in the March 2, 2021, Non-partisan Municipal Primary Election. With the passage of Prop D in November, we now have Approval Voting for the offices of Mayor, Comptroller, President of the Board of Aldermen, and Aldermen. 

For those of us in the 24th Ward, we don't have an Aldermanic race this year, so you'll only have Mayor and Comptroller on your ballot, both qualify for Approval Voting, but since our current Comptroller Green is running unopposed, it doesn't change anything in that race.

With Approval Voting, you can choose one or more candidates that you like in this Primary. The top two vote earners will go on to the General Election (April 6, 2021) and you can select your one favorite there.

So, let's meet the Mayoral Candidates:


LEWIS REED
Reed is currently serving as President of the Board of Aldermen. Running unsuccessfully for Mayor in 2017 Reed received 18.3% of the vote to Lyda Krewson's 32.04% citywide in the Democratic Primary (which had 7 Democrat candidates). In July 2020, Reed introduced BB71 which had language closely mirroring the Rex Sinquefield-funded ballot initiative that had been rushed through the board in an effort to Privatize Lambert Airport. Additionally, Reed is responsible for bringing Nextdoor website/app to Saint Louis. 

"For Lewis Reed, Mayor’s Job Would Allow ‘Implementation’ Of Priorities At Long Last" listen to Lewis' interview on St. Louis Public Radio, here.

First elected in 2015 after unseating a 20-year Alder in the 20th Ward and then winning reelection in 2019 with 70% of the vote. She's been a vocal anti-privatization advocate at the BoA even in the face of intimidation by one of the consultants tied to the effort who threatened to recall her. Spencer has taken on politically connected slumlords and interests in the city and proven herself as a fighter for her community. Spencer's campaign is a grassroots effort fueled by volunteers reflecting her commitment to people over politics. 

"As Mayor, Cara Spencer Would Use ‘Focused Deterrence’ To Fight Crime" listen to Cara's interview on St. Louis Public Radio, here.


TISHAURA O. JONES
Tishaura O. Jones is currently serving as Treasurer for the City of Saint Louis. One day after being re-elected, she announced her candidacy for Mayor. Jones is known for establishing the Office of Financial Empowerment (OFE) during her tenure as City Treasurer. Which among other things, funds a College Kids Program helping St. Louis students save for their college tuition. Criticism of this effort is largely due to compartmentalizing parking revenue funds from the general funds of the city. Advocates for Jones support her use of funds for programs of the OFE, sighting the benefits to city residents, especially youth who otherwise might not be able to fund a college education. 

"As Mayor, Tishaura Jones Would ‘Reenvision’ Public Safety — And Maybe Cut Police Overtime" listen to Tishaura's interview on St. Louis Public Radio, here.

As you may know, reproductive rights are a passion of mine, so I was thrilled to see both Cara Spencer and Tishaura Jones have been endorsed by the political arm of Planned Parenthood and Naral Pro-Choice Missouri has given Jones an endorsement and Spencer the Friends of Reproductive Freedom designation.

Andrew Jones (R) ran for Mayor in 2017 losing to Lyda Krewson by 17.30% to 67.53%. During that race, Jones remarked that "he’s got Democratic apathy on his side"  Candidates won't have their political affiliation listed this time, but Andrew Jones is the only Republican you'll see on your Primary Ballot for Mayor. 

"As Mayor, Andrew Jones Would Have The Police Department’s Back" hear Andrew's interview on St. Louis Public Radio, here.


Personally, I'll be supporting both Cara Spencer and Tishaura Jones in our upcoming Primary.

Alderwoman Dr. Megan Green wrote a great rationale on this and both these candidates also have the Endorsement of our Alderman, Bret Narayan.


2021 Mayoral Debate & Forum Links 

Here are links to watch video from some of the past events:

(1-13-21 video from live event) SLACO Youth Event 
(1-14-21 video from live event)  St. Louis Area Voting Initiative Candidate Forum
(1-17-21 video from live event) Action STL "The People's Debate"
(1-18-21 video from live event)  Qu'art Debate on Queer+ Issues 
(1-19-21 video from live event) St. Louis Young Democrats Event
(1-21-21 video from live event)  Continuum of Care STL Forum on Homelessness
(1-30-21 video from live event) Ward Hosted Forum 
(2-06-21 video from live event) Sponsored by the Community Justice Coalition
(2-16-21video from live event) Environmental Forum hosted by Missouri Sierra Club 
(2-17-21 video from live event) St. Louis Mayoral Forum hosted by The Appeal
(2/23/21 video from live event)- Nine PBS Hosted Virtual Mayoral Debate 
(2/25/21 LINK TBD for Homes for All Forum when available)


In 2017, we had seven Democratic candidates in the Primary. 

Tishaura Jones received the second-highest numbers in the ward with 557 votes and Lewis Reed was 4th with 220 votes, but the clear winner was Lyda Krewson with 960 votes. 



P1 - Clayton/Tamm
P2 - Cheltenham
P3 - Ellendale
P4 - Clifton Heights
P5 - Clifton Heights
P6 - Franz Park
P7- Hi-Point
P8 - Franz Park

You really should VOTE in Municipal Elections.

Did you know that the Mayor and the Comptroller (along with the President of the Board of Aldermen) make up the Board of Estimate and Apportionment (E&A) controlling the city operating budget? Who we elect into these seats directly affects your life as a city resident.

Turnout is historically pretty low in the Municipal Elections. The 24th Ward averaged 28.17% in the 2017 March Municipal Primary and a slightly better 37.01% in the April General (the last Mayoral Election).  I know we can beat these turnout numbers in 2021, so...

Make your plan to vote today. 


Absentee request forms (to have a ballot sent to you) are available NOW for the March 2 Primary and April 6th General Elections. In-person absentee voting will open on 1/20/21 at the Election Board at 300 N. Tucker and additionally in satellite locations two weeks prior to the Election.







Tuesday, November 24, 2020

STL City Approval Voting

On November 3, 2020, 68% of St. Louis City voters passed Approval Voting (Prop D). Leading up to the election, there was a spirited debate about this system, but regardless of how you personally felt (or voted), this is the system we now have in St. Louis City Municipal Elections. 

This is a great video explaining the differences between Plurality voting (our old system), Ranked Choice Voting, and Approval voting (what we have now). 

In Saint Louis City, our Municipal Elections are for the offices of Mayor, Alderman, Comptroller, and President of the Board of Aldermen. On March 2, 2021, we will have our first Primary Election under this new Approval Voting System for Mayor, Odd # Ward Aldermen, and Wards 4 & 12 (due to special elections), and Comptroller. 

Here is a great video from the Missouri ACLU that explains a bit more about what to expect with our new Approval Voting system. 

This is another great (and short!) video explaining approval voting produced by Confluence Scholars Strategy Network.



There are a few differences you'll notice under this new Approval Voting System.


1. Candidates will be gathering signatures to get on the ballot. 


Since Prop D just passed in November and takes effect in this very next Municipal Election in March, candidates are bound by "Section 2.08.330 of the St. Louis City Code of Ordinances pertaining to provisions for nomination -- non-partisan candidates". This ordinance was never designed to be on the books for a non-partisan primary with approval voting but instead has been in place to require candidates who run as Independents to show a measure of support to get on the ballot. I completely expect that the Board of Aldermen will be revisiting this ordinance at some point, but there simply wasn't time ahead of this first Municipal Election. 

I know another point of concern was the "exclusivity" meaning that a voter can only sign one candidate petition per office. While this is the letter of the law currently, I expect this will also might be amended moving forward as it is contradictory to the intentions of Prop D – but even if this doesn't change, what it says is "I have not aided, and will not aid, in the nomination of any other candidate" (Petition = Nomination) so while you can only sign a petition for one candidate per office, once these candidates have filed with the Board of Election you can (and should, in my opinion) help any/all of the candidates you approve of to receive enough votes to make it to the General run-off Election.

If you want to know more about the requirements to run for office under this new system you can read candidate requirements on the Board of Election Website or Show Me Integrity website.


Info sheet provided by the St. Louis City Democratic Central Committee


2. You don't have to pick just one team (yet)!

Our Primaries in St. Louis usually end up being the "real" race, and whoever manages to win the Primary gets the General Election in a walk. This new approval voting system will change that. So, we don't have to choose just one candidate, not yet. This means we now have the opportunity for coalition-building and getting more people behind a couple of great candidates and maybe keeping one we really don't approve of, out. And then ahead of the General (and when we're down to two candidates we like) we can really talk about policy and what differentiates the last two candidates. 

If you choose to only back one candidate this early in the race, you're basically back to the Plurality system we just voted to get rid of. We have an opportunity to work with multiple candidates who align with us, to help them get through to that General Ballot, which is exactly what I intend to do.


3. What to expect when you vote:

Usually in a Primary Election, when you go into cast your ballot (or request your absentee ballot) you are asked which Party ballot you would like. In Missouri, that's Republican, Democrat, Green, Constitution, Libertarian, or Non-Partisan ballots. In the past, "non-partisan ballots used to be issue-only (no candidates) this is no longer the case.

Now, since Municipal elections will have only non-partisan candidates you will have only one ballot that has all the candidates and issues. Remember that this new approval voting ONLY applies to the City offices so in Primary Elections other than Municipal Elections you will choose your party ballot as you always have - this includes elections where the offices of Recorder of Deeds, License Collector and, Collector of Revenue are on the ballot.

When you look at your ballot, it will appear the same, but the big difference is that you can vote for all the candidates you approve of – one or more than one candidate. You may recall voting in SLPS Board races where you could "vote for up to 3" candidates - this is similar.

It's a change, and we're all new to this. I encourage you to read more on the benefits of Approval Voting and encourage you to support ALL the candidates you approve of in this Primary on March 2, 2021.

I also encourage you to read Ten Critiques of Approval Voting which outlines top critiques and rebuttals of the approval voting system and goes on to greater detail about how to vote strategically.

Friday, September 11, 2020

Your 24W General Ballot


As we're all looking ahead to the General Election on November 3, 2020 – it's important to remember that this isn't just a Presidental Election, you've got statewide Missouri offices, State Reps/Senate, City of Saint Louis offices, Judges, and Issues to learn about. This blog is an overview of what's on your ballot, and where you can learn more.

Download Full St. Louis City Sample Ballot

Bookmark the Missouri ACLU Election Hub as a great resource for ballot information, finding a notary, voter information/registration, and keeping up with everything you need ahead of Election Day.

View plain language descriptions on Vote411.org from the non-partisan League of Women Voters about what's on your ballot. The issue summaries below are pulled from their site.


Collective Endorsements - Organization for Black Struggle (OBS)


Here's what you'll see on your November 3rd, 2020 General Election Ballot:


President and Vice President

Much information is available about our current inhabitants of the white house in Donald J. Trump/Mike Pence (R) and the Democratic ticket of Joseph Biden/Kamala Harris (D). 

Missouri Governor

Governor Mike Parson (R) took office on June 1, 2018, following the resignation of Eric Greitens. He's been widely criticized for his lack of statewide leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nicole Galloway (D) is our current MO State Auditor and the only statewide elected Democrat. Galloway has the Endorsement of Emily's List, a National Organization supporting diverse Pro-Choice Democratic candidates. Galloway has been a champion of transparency which is demonstrated in the audit reporting found on the Auditor's website.

Missouri Lieutenant Governor

Current Lt. Governor Mike Kehoe (R) was appointed in 2018 by Mike Parson. Previous, Kehoe served the 6th Senatorial District and was Assistant Majority Floor Leader and Majority Floor Leader. Democratic candidate Alissia Canady (D) is a proven leader with a platform of combating City Violence, Addressing Health Disparities, and promoting Education and Economic Development. She also has been endorsed by Emily's List.

Missouri Secretary of State

The Secretary of State is responsible for: Drafting Fair Ballot Language, Administering Elections, Educating Voters. This makes the SOS one of the most important elected officials in the state. Current SoS Jay Ashcroft (R) has demonstrated that he's not interested in making it easier for Missourians to vote with our confusing voting laws and deceptive ballot language for Amd. 3 that ended up in the courts to get fair language presented to voters. In contrast, Yinka Faleti (D) is a champion for voter's rights. He's also a West Point graduate, and a U.S. Army Veteran. Yinka is running to increase opportunities to vote, reduce barriers to voter participation, and protect and honor our ballot initiative process.

Missouri State Treasurer

Current MO State Treasurer Scott Fitzpatrick (R) has served since 2019 when he was appointed by Parson after Eric Schmitt was appointed to Attorney General creating a vacancy in the Office of State Treasurer. Vicki Englund (D) is a former State Representative with a platform of Experienced Leadership, Economic Recovery Plan, and Dedication to Inclusion. Englund has been posting an idea a day leading up to the election about how to improve Missouri's economy. She is also endorsed by Emily's List.

Missouri Attorney General

Eric Schmitt (R) was appointed by Parson in 2019 to the office of Attorney General after the incumbent, Josh Hawley was elected to the United States Senate. Previously he served as State Treasurer and State Senator. On the Democratic side, Rich Finneran (D) is a former federal prosecutor and Assistant U.S. Attorney. During his time as a federal prosecutor, Rich handled two of the largest financial fraud cases ever prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office. 

U.S. Representative District 1

Congressional District 1 (which encompasses all of Saint Louis city, and parts of STL County) has been represented by Lacy Clay (D) since 2001. Clay lost to Primary Challenger Cori Bush (D) in August 2020 with a platform that puts regular, everyday people first, with solutions that are long overdue. Bush will face Anthony Rogers (R) and Alex Furman (Lib) in November. Rogers has endorsements of Roger Stone and Tiger King star Joshua Dial and Furman is Vice President of STL Proud Boy chapter and served time with drug-related charges.

State Representative District 83

Jo Doll (D) won the Democratic Primary in August to replace term-limited Gina Mitten. With a strong platform focusing on healthcare and family, Doll is the presumptive Rep but will face Andrew Bolin (Lib) on November's ballot before it's official.

State Representative District 84

Current Representative Wiley (Chip) Price IV (D) is running unopposed.

Saint Louis City Circuit Attorney

Incumbent and primary winner Kimberly M. Gardner (D) is challenged by Daniel Zdrodowski (R). Zdrodowski is critical of Gardner's work, but Gardner easily won the primary with 60.7% of the vote.

Saint Louis City Sheriff

Incumbent and primary winner Vernon Betts (D) is challenged by John N. Castellano III (R). St. Louis city has had a Democratic Sheriff since 1933.

Saint Louis City Treasurer

Incumbent and primary winner Tishaura O. Jones (D) is challenged by Robert Vroman (R). Vroman describes himself as "pro-business, pro-choice, pro-gun, pro-immigrant, anti-prohibition, anti-war" in contrast, Jones is working to improve the overall financial health of city residents by opening the Office of Financial Empowerment, offering free financial literacy classes and counseling, and the College Kids Savings Program. 

For candidates, I will be voting the straight D ticket on these races.

Judges

Missouri Supreme Court Judge, Missouri Court of Appeals (Eastern District) Judges, Circuit Court Judges (22nd Judicial Circuit), Associate Circuit Court Judges (22nd Judicial Circuit)

Researching judges is always something that I get a lot of questions about. The best resource we have to see how the MO Bar Review Committee rates our judges at YourMissouriJudges.org 


Thread by Rebecca Rivas (Reporter for @MO_Independent) on 22nd Circuit Judges.

Constitutional Amendment 1 

"Do you want to amend the Missouri Constitution to extend the two term restriction that currently applies to the Governor and Treasurer to the Lt. Governor, Secretary of State, Auditor and the Attorney General?"

A “yes” vote will amend the Missouri Constitution to impose a two term restriction on all statewide elected officials, which currently only applies to the Governor and Treasurer.
A “no” vote will leave the terms that statewide elected officials may serve unchanged.

State and local governmental entities estimate no costs or savings from this proposal.

Summary: If passed, Amendment 1 would limit the lieutenant governor, secretary of state, state auditor and attorney general to two terms. The state constitution now limits only the governor and treasurer to two terms. Supporters say term limits will keep elected officials from becoming career politicians. Opponents contend that those positions should be limited by voters, not the constitution.

24WPD have endorsed Yes on 1.


Constitutional Amendment 3 

Known as "Dirty Missouri" This effort by those in Jeff City would overturn the Clean Missouri Amendment voters passed by 62% in 2018. So, if you voted yes on Clean MO, vote NO on 3.

"Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to:
• Ban gifts from paid lobbyists to legislators and their employees;
• Reduce legislative campaign contribution limits;
• Change the redistricting process voters approved in 2018 by: (i) transferring responsibility for drawing state legislative districts from the Nonpartisan State Demographer to Governor-appointed bipartisan commissions; (ii) modifying and reordering the redistricting criteria.

State governmental entities expect no cost or savings. Individual local governmental entities expect significant decreased revenues of a total unknown amount."

A “yes” vote overturns the will of 62% of MO voters who passed Clean MO in 2018
A “no” vote upholds what voters passed in 2018 with Clean MO

Summary: This proposal asks voters to reverse key parts of a "Clean Missouri'' redistricting overhaul they approved in 2018. The ballot language was disputed and had to be finalized by a Missouri Western District Court of Appeals ruling.

If passed, Amendment 3 would eliminate the nonpartisan state demographer used for redistricting approved in 2018. It would return to the use of bipartisan commissions in the state house and state senate appointed by the governor. It would not use the total population count to determine districts, but only count eligible voters. It would also change the limit of lobbyists' gifts from $5 to $0 and lower the campaign contribution limit for state senate campaigns from $2,500 to $2,400.

Supporters say that voters need to be given another chance to consider the issue of redistricting. They also say that bipartisan commissions would less likely be corrupted, reflect the views of different communities and protect minorities.

Opponents say that Amendment 3 is the legislators' gerrymandering amendment, and that it would reverse the 2018 voters' decision, thus threatening democracy. Missouri would be the only state in the country to discount 1.5 million children, immigrants, international students and incarcerated citizens. Communities of color would be significantly underrepresented.

I urge you to vote NO on 3. 24WPD have also endorsed No on 3.


Proposition D

Proposed by Initiative Petition and supported by STL Approves, this would change how local STL elections are run taking effect ahead of our Municipal Elections in March 2021.

"Shall the City of St. Louis adopt an ordinance to:
* establish an open, non-partisan system for elections to the offices of Mayor, Comptroller, President of the Board of Aldermen, and Alderman
* enable voters to choose all the candidates they wish in the open, non-partisan primary
* allow the top two candidates to then compete in a runoff general election?"

"Yes" vote would change the elections to this format
"No" vote would keep elections as they are

Summary: This proposition was placed on the ballot through an initiative petition drive. If passed, it would remove party affiliations from the primary ballot for candidates for mayor, comptroller, aldermanic president and alderman, and make the general election a runoff between the top two vote-getting candidates for each post. In the primary, voters could vote for any or all candidates they approve and then would vote for one in the general election. The change would go into effect for the 2021 elections. Supporters complain that some city officials have been elected with less than 40% of the primary vote under the current system. They add that under the proposition, some officeholders would be elected with broader citywide support. They also point out that nonpartisan city elections are held in all other Missouri municipalities and 80% of municipalities nationwide. Opponents say political parties would be hurt and lose their candidates' party identity and that the ward committee system would be weakened. They also say residents would be confused by the proposed change.

Both 24WPD and both committeepersons in the 24th endorse Yes on D.

Proposition 1

"Shall Section 2 of Article VIII of the City of St. Louis Charter, which requires all officers and employees of the City of St. Louis to reside within the City's boundaries, be amended to permit the employees of the City of St. Louis except for City agency and department directors appointed by the Mayor to reside outside of the City's boundaries?"

"Yes" vote would allow city employees to live outside city boundaries
"No" vote would keep the current requirement in place for city residency.

An important note about this Proposition, this DOES NOT include employees of SLMPD as that requirement has already been lifted by the MO Legislature and was signed into law 9/21/20.

Summary: The measure, a proposed amendment to the city charter, would extend repeal of the city residency requirement to all city civil service employees. A state law passed in September already has removed the requirement for employees of the police and fire departments and other first responders hired before September 2023. Supporters of repeal say it could help the city attract more people to fill hundreds of vacancies in city government. Opponents say the residency requirement makes it more likely that city employees will know the areas they serve. Opponents also argue that the city personnel department should do a better job recruiting city residents for available jobs.

24WPD have endorsed No on 1.

Proposition R

"Shall the City of St. Louis levy an additional tax of six cents per each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation as authorized by Section 210.860 R.S.Mo. for the purpose of providing additional funding for community children's services, in particular, early childhood services for children aged five years and under, in addition to the current levy of nineteen cents per each one hundred dollars ($100) of assessed valuation?"

"Yes" vote would allow additional sales tax
"No" vote would not add sales tax

Prop R is similar to a scenario that recently hit a roadblock in the County. 

Summary: City officials want to increase the tax rate for the community children's services fund from 19 cents per $100 dollars assessed valuation to 25 cents, the maximum allowed by state law. The Children's Services fund is administered by the city mental health board. If passed, the owner of a $150,000 home would pay about $17 more a year, and about $2.3 million would be raised annually. The additional funds would be targeted for early childhood services for children under age 5 in the city's most vulnerable neighborhoods.

Supporters say early childhood education is a key to success in school. The current 225 licensed early childhood centers serve about 10,000 children, but many more need these services. Parents of these children would be able to work and pursue educational opportunities to improve their families' lives.

24WPD are No on R.
OBS, Teacher's Union, and STL School Board have all OPPOSED this measure.

Proposition T

"Should Chapter 23 of the Revised Code of the City of St. Louis be amended to impose a gross receipts tax of seven and one half percent of the gross receipts obtained from Telecommunications Providers, which are and include every entity now or hereafter engaged in a general telecommunication business in the City, providing telecommunication, telecommunications exchange, or local, toll, or long distance, telephone service to its customers with a service or billing address within the St. Louis City limits; and Fiber Networks Providers, which are and include every entity now or hereafter engaged in providing fiber networks, built whole or in part in the City's public right of way, which are not internet or service providers subject to franchise fees, to customers and other users of fiber networks?"

"Yes" vote would impose tax on Telecomm Providers
"No" vote would not 

Summary: Officials want to replace the city's $2.20 per linear feet right-of-way fee that network providers pay before giving service, with a gross receipt tax of 7.5 percent. If passed, customers will pay the same tax as they do for telephone service. The right-of-way fee is currently rolled into internet charges. Some parts of the city, particularly north of Delmar, are getting poor service, supporters say. They add if the right-of-way fee is eliminated, providers will have a strong incentive to move into new neighborhoods, competitors will enter the market and all parts of the city will get better service. Providers will not have to pay high fees up front. They can collect the tax after gaining customers.

24WPD has endorsed Yes on T.


Make your VOTING PLAN now, and make sure your voice is heard on 11/3/20! Please check back to this blog as it will be updated as new sources/information becomes available.



Wednesday, September 2, 2020

Be a Poll Worker

As many of you know, I've been working as an Election Judge for the past handful of Elections. And this year, it's especially important to recruit new Poll Workers because many of those to consistently do this work unavailable due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. 

Signing up to be a Poll Worker is an important way you can ensure we don't have polling locations close. Staffing Poll Workers is key to keeping all of our city polling locations open, making it as accessible as possible for voters to cast their votes. 

We can't have a successful Election Day without some of us stepping up to do the work on November 3rd.



There are a couple different jobs you could have on Election Day:

Election Judge Poll Worker

Check-in and assist voters on Election Day, these are partisan roles

In order to become an Election Judge in the City of St. Louis, residents must:
• Be a City of St. Louis resident
• Be 18 years of age or older and a registered voter
• Be able to read, write, and speak the English language
• Be available from 5:00 a.m. until the closing of the polls
• Attend a training session prior to the Election
• Pay per Election = $125 (includes mandatory training pay)
• Declare a Political party (Democrat, Republican or Independent)



Technical Specialist Poll Worker

Set up and maintain all the technical aspects of the polling place machines under the direction and rules specified by law, the BOE, and poll managers, this is a non-partisan role. 

Requirements: (including those above except this is non-partisan)
• Must have basic computer comprehension and mechanical skills 
• Non-Partisan Position Pay per Election $150 (includes 6-hour training class)
• Must have your own vehicle 
• Able to lift 40 lbs



High School Student Poll Worker

St. Louis City High School Student Election Participation Project

The following guidelines apply to High School students seeking to become a poll worker:

• Students must be at least 15 years old and in tenth, eleventh, or twelfth grade at a St. Louis City High School 
• Students who are 16, 17, or 18 years of age can earn community service hours for training service and working on Election Day(s) OR may be compensated monetarily for their services
• Students must serve as Student Poll Workers/Greeters with the permission of a parent or legal guardian
• Students must have a recommendation from their high school for participation in the program. [Principal or counselor preferred]
• Students will work in a non-partisan capacity
• Students hours on Election Day are 5:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (Ask regarding partnering hours.)

Mail your paper application to:

Attn: Summer Richardson
Assistant Deputy Republican Director
St. Louis City Board of Election Commissioners
300 N. Tucker
St. Louis, MO 63101

or FAX the hard-copy application to 314-622-4060

Democratic Poll Watchers/Challengers

Democratic Poll Watchers are not employed by the Election Board but are credentialed and allowed to be in a polling location to watch the process. If you're interested in volunteering in the city of St. Louis as a Democratic Watcher/Challenger send Carolyn an email and her know you'd like to know more.

Election Protection Volunteers

Sign up to work for the Saint Louis Voter Protection Coalition (866-OUR-VOTE). They need roving monitors, polling place monitors, social media monitors (an ongoing volunteer position starting soon!), folks to help place 866OURVOTE signs at polling places, and lawyers to answer the hotline & pursue urgent problems. All volunteer positions can be contactless. Sign up and learn more. 

Let's do this.

So, make this year the year YOU help make our elections run smoothly and witness Democracy in action by working as a Poll Worker. I won't lie to you, it's a long day... but it's also incredibly rewarding.

If you are employed by the Election Board, you can vote absentee in-person ahead of Election Day. 

Learn more about how you can be involved in St. Louis City Board of Election Commissioners website. Or if you're outside the city, you can apply on your local election authority website or learn more on the Secretary of State website.

FYI: You may also See Poll Managers and Roving Deputies in the city. Poll Managers are long-time Election Judges who will oversee the operations at each polling location, they work in bi-partisan teams, meaning there will a Republican and Democrat Poll Manager at each polling location. Roving Deputies also work in bi-partisan teams but they rotate between polling locations within a ward of the city. Roving Deputies are escorted by an SLMPD officer, they are why you might see more police around your polling location than usual. Rovers are ultimately responsible for returning ballots back to the Board of Election downtown after polls close, so remember, while it's a long day for all Election Judges, it's the longest day for a Roving Deputy and Poll Managers. Bring them coffee.